COMPARATIVE 202C This course will cover some of the central trends and thinkers in Western
literary aesthetics from the late 18th century to the early
20th century. We will discuss Kant, Hegel, several English
romantic theories, the Russian social critics, Marx and Engels, phenomenological
criticism, and Heidegger. Lectures by instructor and oral reports by students.
COMPARATIVE 210 We will be spending about half of the class examining the ancient tradition of literature about slaves in drama, lyric and prose fiction and the other half on the servant in modern literature. We will be focusing on the implications of treating master (or mistress) and slave/servant as a symbiotic unit in which the relation of dominance undergoes various transformations. The organization of the class will be thematic rather than historical, and some of the themes to be covered will be: the ironic relations between domination and dependence, servitude and control; the master's knowledge and the servant's, love and servitude/love as servitude; the servant as narrator and the reader as servant. We will read comedies of Aristophanes and Plautus; Apuleius' novel The
Golden Ass; the anonymous Life of Aesop; poems by Ovid, Horace and Propertius.
The modern works we read will depend on students' interest. Possibilities
include: comedies by Shakespeare and Beaumarchais; Diderot's Jacques
the Fatalist, Richardson's Pamela, Lazarillo de Tormes, medieval
and renaissance love poetry; Melville's Benito Cereno; Narrative of
the life of Frederick Douglass; Losey's film The Servant. The main
secondary text will be Bruce Robbins's The Servant's Hand, but some other
critical texts will be assigned.
CULTURAL STUDIES 202 During the course of this seminar we will consider how specific geographic
sites are constructed as cultural loci for the insertion of non-official
cultures within the dominant landscape. The significance and influence
of folklore, popular culture, and religion will figure into our discussions
of these sites, read through analectical/theoretical works by Soja, Krase,
Bruno, Davis, etc. The seminar will include visits to some of these sites
around San Diego.
CULTURAL STUDIES 225 While it has become increasingly clear over the past 30 years that race occupies a central place in so-called public debates that affect our lives in the most intimate and personal of ways, it is less clear why this is so. In debates over jobs and dollars, housing, policing, immigration, welfare "reform," balanced budgets, urban crisis, affirmative action, prisons, and censorship, all of these debates revolve around racial meaning and racial structure. Despite the centrality of the state in all of these debates, however, very little intellectual labor has been spent thinking through the complexities of the state or what role the state might play in producing a racial order. While we may agree that a racial order exists, it remains difficult to discern where it comes from given the current intellectual tools for doing so. The "method" if we can call it that, within current scholarship around questions of race, has been to either reduce these processes, events, moments, to "political" acts (in the most reductive sense of the term) or to see them simply as taking place within a larger (and much more important) political economic field, wherein the state is simply an intermediary to capital or simply one of a number of "sites" within which contestations over race take place. Against this tendency, in this course, we will be examining the multitude of ways which the state is responsible for the production and maintenance of a racial order, how it organizes inequality via racialized state practice, and what the implications are for intellectual "race work"-both in the academy as well as on the ground. Taking up abstract questions around state theory and contemporary state forms, as well as debates around more distinct social practices (welfare, immigration, policing, for instance), and their encoding within popular narratives, this course is meant as an initial exploration into an admittedly dense and complex subject. With that in mind, students need not feel that they need a background in state theory, though academic work on race and racialized process would be helpful. This course is meant to be interdisciplinary in scope and method. Students from other departments are encouraged to enroll. In addition to the regular weekly meetings, students will be responsible
for meeting in study groups (also once a week). Students will also be
encouraged to enter their own research into the broader framework of the
class. Readings for Week One will be available in the Literature Department
during Finals Week of Winter quarter.
LITERATURES IN ENGLISH 245 Houses and homes have always been central to the U.S. national imaginary, but perhaps never in so sustained a manner as between the years 1838 and 1876. Consider:
GERMAN LITERATURE 241 GERMAN ROMANTICISM Crisis of Representations Instructor: William O'Brien This course will examine German Romanticism as a period central to the crisis of representations in which we still to live. Caught between the era of bourgeois revolutions and the beginning of bourgeois reaction and dominance, yet trailing a legacy from the ancien regime, the problems of Romanticism continue to effect our lives in political, economic, aesthetic, religious, and aesthetic practices--often most strongly when we believe we that we have most clearly freed ourselves of them. This course will focus on four areas of representation: politics, religion, philosophy, and literature / aesthetics. Our concentration on these areas is by no means meant to limit discussion to these areas, but also to provoke examination of other areas effected by the crises of representations marked in Romanticism. To examine the beginnings, problematics, and implications of the crises of representation signalled by German Romanticism, we will necessarily draw on influential writings from other linguistic traditions and other "literary periods." Our readings will thus be drawn from those of Plato, Rousseau, Winckelmann, Wackenroder, Friedrich Schlegel, Novalis, Hoelderlin, Tieck, and E.T.A. Hoffmann, and perhaps Wordsworth, Coleridge, Chateaubriand, and Nerval. German is not necessary for this course, though it will be useful. All texts will be available in the original languages as well as English translation. The course is open to students from all sections of the Literature Department,
as well as all interested students from other departments.
SPANISH LITERATURE 272 This year's seminar will deal with theories and narratives of spatial
dispersion, displacement and relocation. The story of migration is a social-economic-political
tale narrated in oral histories, folktales, songs and poetry, testimonials,
short stories, novels and, of course, histories. We will focus on the
construction in literature--especially Latin American and Latino/Chicano
literature--of the relation between capital mobility, geographical mobility,
social mobility, political exile, restructuring and the development of
a transnational labor force. In the process we will examine several literary
texts and a variety of social/economic/ cultural theories to assess to
what extent the micro-social concerns of immigrants are examined in relation
to the macro-economic concerns of transnational capital. The course will
be conducted in Spanish although some of the readings will be in English.
LITERATURE THEORY 200A This is one of the three required «core» seminars for first-year doctoral
students. This segment of the sequence will be devoted to the evolution
of critical theory during the last thirty years. They include the following
vibrant questions, polemics and topics: Structuralism , post-structuralism
and deconstruction, Frankfurt and neo-Frankfurt, modernism and post-modernism,
Lacan and psychoanalytic cultural critiques, semiotics of text and culture.
LITERATURE THEORY 210 The aim of this course is to provide the student with an understanding
of some of the foundational texts in the tradition of marxist literary
theory and cultural criticism. We will try to distinguish a critical component
of this tradition from dogmatic representations of both the left and the
right. Since poststructuralist theory and postmodernist practice constitute
major faultlines in twentieth-century intellectual history, we'll try
to sort out some of the continuities and discontinuities between these
more recent movements and the earlier marxist tradition. The first part
of this course will involve close and critical reading of major theoretical
texts by Marx--including (with Engels) The German Ideology (1845-46);
selections from Grundrisse (1857-8), and vol. 1 of Capital
(1867). Depending on how much time remains in the latter part of the quarter,
we will go on to consider selected writings of Lukacs, Adorno and Horkheimer,
Althusser, Williams, and others. Students will be encouraged to develop
individual or group projects involving particular readings that are related
to their primary areas of concentration either in terms of a historical
period (a student of early modern culture might want to examine the Brenner
debate concerning the transition from feudalism to capitalism; a postmodernist
might want to examine Mandel's notion of "late capitalism,"
evaluating Fredric Jameson's use of that category in light of questions
posted by Mike Davis and other critics of Jameson); a genre (literary,
musical, visual, plastic, or "virtual"); a topic (such as slavery;
domestic labor; colonialism; national and transnational cultures; distinctions
between "high" and "popular," or "high"
and "mass," or "standard" and "non-standard"
cultures).Throughout the quarter we will be asking whether the priority
of the categories of labor, class and production-relations in marxist
theory and historiography is (or is not) compatible with forms of postmodern
cultural critique that emphasize race, gender, ethnicity, sexuality, religion,
the circulation of commodities and of signs, the deconstruction of totality,
etc. Toward that end we will work together in developing a bibliography
of recent texts that analyze, criticize, and in some instances revise
Marx from a contemporary standpoint.
LITERATURE THEORY 220 The aim of this seminar is to propose a critical examination of Poststructuralism: its origins, its achievements, its limits. During the past thirty years, this theoretical trend has been highly influential, and the term commonly designates a group of philosophers or theoreticians: Deleuze, Derrida, Foucault, Althusser, Serres, Lyotard, Lacan, Barthes, Kristeva, Genette, Marin, De Man etc. There are nevertheless striking differences between these thinkers, and the "postructurtalist" label is only a convenient manner to unite them under a minimal common denominator. Their progenies go also their varied ways. Those who trek the trails of Foucault or Deleuze have limited interests to share with those who pursue the task of Derridian deconstruction. Thus, a first question arises: why call these thinkers 'Poststructutralists'? In order to answer, we need first to explore what Structuralism meant, and the profound changes the Structuralist approach--first developed in Linguistics and Anthropology-- made possible in the field of Philosophy but also those of Psychoanalysis, Marxism, History, Literary Theory, and, generallyspeaking, in the Social Sciences. We will try to understand this movement as an original attempt to combine two diametrically opposite strategies for shaping the theoretical discourse: the first, proceeding by speculative construction, is aresearch of the conceptual conditions of truth (the philosophical tradition par excellence); the second, providing an interpretation of cultural and historical experiences (as do ancient hermeneutics and present cultural studies ), speculates in priority on the conditions of meaning understood not only as forms but as forces. This opposition is, in fact, at the core of the present debate on universalism and cultural diversity. NB - This seminar will be conducted (in English) as a workshop: each
session will be devoted to a specific problem or author. Texts of reference
(ex: Saussure, Levi-Strauss, Deleuze, Foucault, Lacan etc) and commentaries
will be distributed in advance to facilitate an adequate preparation.
A short presentation of each text will be made by one or two students,
and then followed by the instructor's explanations and a general discussion.
Students who plan to enroll will start to receive a bibliography and some
Xeroxed texts by the middle of February.
LITERATURE THEORY 297 Topic and reading list TBA.
LITERATURE WRITING 271 Composition theorists have drawn on poststructuralist and other critical theory to reconsider both pedagogical theory and pedagogical practice, restructuring and strengthening their critiques of conceptions of writing and the writer, of educational institutions, and of the relationship of both student writers and writing teachers to wide public debate. This course will consider some of the poststructuralist assumptions, analyses, and interpretations of these critiques, as well as their expression in specific arguments about composition theory and practice, their relationship to other, related conversations such as those of feminist and ethnic studies, and their connections to wider debate about the nature of public life. There will be considerable and close attention to the writings of Foucault and his composition interpreters, much reading, much discussion, much informal and formal writing. LITERATURE WRITING 280
In this class you will write imaginatively every week, producing a collection of poems or prose around a single theme or vision. The class readings will be drawn from writings that explore human interiority as a preplexing phenomenon, even a religious phenomenon. Beginning with Plato and Plotinus and including Dogen, the Upanishads, Teresa of Avila, Saint John of the Cross, Rumi, Catherine of Siena, Coleridge, Blake, Emily Bronte, Simone Weil, Levinas and others collected in a reader, writing should be focussed on issues specific to "the inside". Each student will give one oral presentation, based in research, as well as reading his or her own imaginatiave work. |